Coolpad S100
From Wiki-IoT
Classification
| Coolpad S100 | |
|---|---|
| Classification | |
| Grade | C |
| Calculator version | 1 |
| Classification date | 2025-10-08 |
| Information | |
| Name | Coolpad s100 |
| Brand by Parent | Coolpad by Coolpad |
| Generation | first |
| Model(s) | A3101, A3103, A3104, A3105, A2848, A3102, A3106 |
| Release date | 2012-03-27 |
| Type/Category | Smartphone |
| Website | [1] |
| Status | End of sale |
| More | |
| Dimensions | 2.4 inches |
| Mass | 187 g |
| Operating system | Android |
| Companion App | https://www.coolpad.com/#/ |
| CPU | |
| GPU | |
| Memory | |
| Storage | |
| Battery | |
| Power | |
| Charging | |
| Display | |
| Camera | |
| Sound | |
| Connectivity | |
| Device | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Value | Proof(s) | Comment |
| Known hardware tampering | Rare | [2] | As a legitimate brand device, widespread hardware tampering is rare, though risks may exist in unofficial supply chains. |
| Known vulnerabilities | Rare | [3] | Runs an old Android version (e.g., based on Android 11) with no ongoing security updates, making known vulnerabilities more common |
| Prior attacks | Rare | [4] | No widely reported targeted attacks, but general risk exists due to outdated OS and lack of patches. |
| Updatability | Rare | [5] | Official support for OS upgrades and security patches is limited or has ended for this model. |
| Category score | 2 | ||
| System | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Value | Proof(s) | Comment |
| Authentication with other systems | Partial | [6] | Supports basic screen lock methods (pattern, PIN, password) but lacks advanced integrations (e.g., biometrics with third-party systems). |
| Communications | Encrypted with obselete encryption | [7] | Supports TLS for communications, but implementation depends on app-level settings; system-level encryption may be outdated. |
| Storage | Encrypted with obselete encryption | [8] | Likely uses legacy Full-Disk Encryption (FDE) based on its Android version, rather than modern File-Based Encryption (FBE). |
| Category score | 2 | ||
| User Authentication | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Value | Proof(s) | Comment |
| Account management | Basic | [9] | Basic Google account and device screen lock management supported; lacks enterprise or advanced account controls. |
| Authentication | Basic | [10] | Relies on basic knowledge factors (PIN/pattern). Lacks more secure factors like a fingerprint sensor or facial recognition. |
| Brute-force protection | Basic | [11] | Includes basic protections like time delays after failed attempts, but may lack advanced rate-limiting or adaptive measures |
| Event logging | Partial logging | [12] | No evidence of enforced password complexity or mandatory changes; defaults are simple and user-defined. |
| Passwords | Default/Common/Easy to guess | [13] | No evidence of forced password change or complexity requirements upon first use. Security relies heavily on user awareness. |
| Category score | 3 | ||
| Grade | C |
|---|