Sonoff S26 Smart Plug (S26)

From Wiki-IoT
Revision as of 11:03, 21 October 2026 by Huangyiji20232903 (talk | contribs) (Initial classification of Sonoff S26 Smart Plug (LAB assignment))

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)



Sonoff S26 Smart Plug (S26)
Security Grade
   
     D
   
Calculator vv1
Sonoff S26 Smart Plug (S26)
   Category: Smart plug • Model / Gen: S26 S26
   Release Date: 2019-04-01 • Status: In sale
   Classification Date: 2026-10-21 • Official Website

Security Evaluation

1. Device Security

Criterion Value Proof Comment
Known hardware tampering Very common πŸ”— Proof The S26 enclosure is trivially opened and the programming header is exposed; third-party firmware flashing is widespread. Open debug interfaces and missing Secure Boot are documented across the Sonoff line.
Known vulnerabilities Very common πŸ”— Proof Cloud-side device takeover plus Wi-Fi credential disclosure during pairing (CVE-2020-12702).
Prior attacks Rare πŸ”— Proof Documented attack path demonstrated by researchers; no large-scale exploitation observed
Updatability Very common πŸ”— Proof Updates are delivered through the eWeLink app; control of the update URL by an attacker was part of the reported impact.
Category Score Score: 3 / 3

2. System Security

Criterion Value Proof Comment
Authentication with other systems Partial πŸ”— Proof The cloud API accepts a device registration request without checking whether the device already belongs to another account.
Communications Encrypted with obselete encryption πŸ”— Proof ESP-Touch quick pairing discloses full Wi-Fi credentials (CVE-2020-12702).
Storage Encrypted with obselete encryption πŸ”— Proof No Secure Boot; firmware and stored credentials can be extracted via the debug interface.
Category Score Score: 2 / 3

3. User Authentication

Criterion Value Proof Comment
Account management Basic πŸ”— Proof Server-side authorization is incomplete: only the login token is checked, device ownership is not.
Authentication Basic πŸ”— Proof Device key material leaks through logs, Bluetooth pairing and the shared-homepage endpoint.
Brute-force protection Absent πŸ”— Proof Bitdefender states the flaw lets a remote user take over any device by guessing or brute-forcing its unique ID, indicating no effective throttling.
Event logging Partial logging πŸ”— Proof Sensitive parameters reach mobile logs; no security-grade audit logging.
Passwords Require change after setup πŸ”— Proof Authentication relies on the eWeLink account; no enforced complexity policy documented.
Category Score Score: 3 / 3

Technical Specifications

Property Details
Operating System & App ESP8266 RTOS SDK (Companion App: eWeLink)
Hardware (CPU / GPU) CPU: ESP8266EX • GPU:
Memory & Storage Memory: • Storage: 1 MB flash
Power, Battery & Charging Battery: • Power: 100-240 V AC, 10 A max • Charging:
Display & Camera Display: • Camera:
Sound & Connectivity Sound: • Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Physical (Dimensions & Mass) Dimensions: 100 x 57 x 60 mm • Mass: approx. 90 g


Overall assessment: The S26 inherits the eWeLink platform weaknesses documented by Bitdefender: the cloud API does not verify device ownership, and the short device ID makes remote takeover by guessing practical. Physically, the enclosure opens easily and the programming header is exposed with no Secure Boot, so firmware and stored credentials can be extracted. OTA updates exist but the update URL itself was part of the reported attack surface. This is the weakest device in this batch.