You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
COMPLETE-FIELD RESEARCH DRAFT - ASSUMPTIONS REQUIRE REVIEW BEFORE PUBLICATION. Device: Synology DiskStation DS225+. Review date: 20 October 2026. All twelve classification criteria have a selected value. This does not mean every rating is independently verified. No particular NAS unit, installed build or deployment configuration was tested. Administrator-only fields remain untouched. General specifications: https://www.synology.com/en-us/products/DS225%2B . Initial release date: https://www.synology.com/en-us/company/news/2025 . Intel documentation identifies UHD Graphics 600 in the J4125; availability to DSM has not been verified. The model manual documents a fault-alert beeper. Evidence and judgment: Update availability, account management, configurable brute-force protection and account-access logging are documented capabilities. Partial authentication with other systems and Basic user authentication are reasoned draft assessments based on selectable NFS security modes and physical credential-reset behaviour. Hardware-tampering frequency (Rare), vulnerability frequency (Very common), mandatory first-setup password change with complexity, and CR2032 battery information include user-supplied judgments or specifications; model-specific confirmation is incomplete. Explicit scope assumptions for the final three selections: 1. Prior attacks = Very common at the Synology NAS class/platform level. Official 2019 and 2021 reports document repeated campaigns, but predate DS225+. This is not proof of DS225+ incidents or a measured attack frequency. DeadBolt is not used as DS225+-specific evidence. 2. Communications = Encrypted with up-to-date encryption for the HTTPS management channel using TLS 1.2/1.3. HTTPS use is assumed, not verified. Unencrypted or legacy traffic may exist for other services. 3. Storage = Encrypted with up-to-date encryption for data volumes with encryption enabled (DSM LUKS/AES xts-plain64). This is an explicitly limited data-volume assessment, not confirmation of internal-flash encryption. Wiki-IoT literally refers to flash; that scope difference remains unresolved. These selections complete the form without inventing a nonexistent Partial radio option. They must not be presented as unconditional security guarantees. Review the scope differences and unverified first-setup password, battery, firmware-build and frequency assumptions before publication.
For new submissions, pages will appear blank until approval.
Summary: This is a minor edit Watch this page
Save page Show preview Show changes Cancel
