Teltonika RUT300 (RUT300)

From Wiki-IoT
Revision as of 06:26, 24 October 2026 by Zhize (talk | contribs) (Add RUT300 documented assessment; flag unresolved evidence)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)

Assessment status: incomplete evidence review. Flash encryption and real-world attack frequency remain unscored. Any automatically displayed grade is not a validated overall security conclusion.



Teltonika RUT300 (RUT300)
Security Grade
   
     
   
Calculator v
Teltonika RUT300
   Brand: Teltonika 
   Category: Router • Model / Gen:  RUT300
   Release Date: 2021-03-10 • Status: 
   Classification Date:  • Official Website

Security Evaluation

1. Device Security

Criterion Value Proof Comment
Known hardware tampering Rare πŸ”— Proof Physical reset and Ethernet bootloader recovery are documented. Rare is a qualitative physical-exposure rating, not measured attack prevalence.
Known vulnerabilities Very common πŸ”— Proof The model firmware history records multiple CVE fixes. This describes historical exposure; it does not claim patched versions remain vulnerable.
Prior attacks πŸ”— Proof Unscored: model-specific real-world attack frequency has not been established. Vulnerability disclosures alone do not demonstrate exploitation.
Updatability Rare πŸ”— Proof Latest listed firmware is 7.14.5 dated 2026-04-15; recent releases are sparse. The product is in the vendor EOL catalogue, not necessarily already unsupported.
Category Score Score: 2 / 3

2. System Security

Criterion Value Proof Comment
Authentication with other systems Partial πŸ”— Proof Certificates and authenticated services are configurable; universal mutual authentication across all interfaces is not established.
Communications No encryption πŸ”— Proof Conservative baseline: local HTTP is enabled and HTTPS redirection defaults off in this model manual. HTTPS is also available; not all communications are plaintext.
Storage πŸ”— Proof Unscored: backup encryption documentation does not establish encryption of data stored in flash. Do not infer whole-flash encryption from encrypted exports.
Category Score Score: Expression error: Missing operand for +. / 3

3. User Authentication

Criterion Value Proof Comment
Account management Full πŸ”— Proof Separate WebUI users, editable permission groups, password changes and lower-privilege access are documented. SSH accounts have separate constraints.
Authentication Basic πŸ”— Proof Password login is the baseline. Optional stronger methods must be configured; recovery-mode security and installed firmware were not tested.
Brute-force protection Exist πŸ”— Proof The model manual documents IP blocking after failed SSH/WebUI logins, enabled by default with a configurable threshold of 10.
Event logging Partial logging πŸ”— Proof Failed-login source, protocol and attempt status are available. Persistent audit completeness and log retention have not been verified.
Passwords Require change after setup with complexity requirements πŸ”— Proof Initial setup requires a new password; complexity requirements are documented. Defaults vary across firmware and hardware batches.
Category Score Score: 2 / 3

Technical Specifications

Property Details
Operating System & App RutOS (Companion App: )
Hardware (CPU / GPU) CPU: • GPU:
Memory & Storage Memory: • Storage:
Power, Battery & Charging Battery: • Power: • Charging:
Display & Camera Display: • Camera:
Sound & Connectivity Sound: • Connectivity:
Physical (Dimensions & Mass) Dimensions: • Mass:


Scope and evidence gaps

Documentation review dated 2026-10-24; no hands-on testing. Ratings describe documented features and explicitly identified assumptions, not every deployed configuration. Two unknown criteria are intentionally left unscored rather than equated with safety or lack of encryption. Administrator review is requested before treating the calculated grade as final.

Release date uses the manufacturer introduction announcement: manufacturer announcement.

See the vendor lifecycle table for support milestones.