Coolpad M30
From Wiki-IoT
Classification
| Coolpad M30 | |
|---|---|
| Classification | |
| Grade | F |
| Calculator version | [[:Category:Calculator v|]] |
| Classification date | |
| Information | |
| Name | 酷派 cool 30 |
| Brand by Parent | Coolpad by Coolpad Group Limited |
| Generation | 30th |
| Model(s) | 4GB+64GB、4GB+128GB 6GB+128GB |
| Release date | 2023-04-01 |
| Type/Category | Smartphone |
| Website | [1] |
| Status | In sale |
| More | |
| Dimensions | 164.3 mm × 75.66 mm × 8.5 mm |
| Mass | 199.6 g |
| Operating system | Android |
| Companion App | https://www.coolpad.com/#/ |
| CPU | |
| GPU | |
| Memory | |
| Storage | |
| Battery | |
| Power | |
| Charging | |
| Display | |
| Camera | |
| Sound | |
| Connectivity | |
| Device | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Value | Proof(s) | Comment |
| Known hardware tampering | Rare | [2] | As a legitimate brand device, widespread hardware-level malicious tampering is uncommon, but risks exist with unofficial repair channels. |
| Known vulnerabilities | Rare | [3] | Runs an old Android version (e.g., COOL OS based on Android 11) with no ongoing official security updates, leaving potential known vulnerabilities exploitable. |
| Prior attacks | Rare | [4] | No widely reported targeted attacks, but risk from generic Android malware is consistent with similar devices due to the outdated OS. |
| Updatability | None | [5] | Official support for both OS upgrades and security patches has essentially ceased for this model. |
| Category score | 3 | ||
| System | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Value | Proof(s) | Comment |
| Authentication with other systems | Partial | [6] | Supports basic screen lock methods (pattern, PIN, password) but typically lacks advanced biometrics (e.g., fingerprint) or secure key integration. |
| Communications | No encryption | [7] | Encryption for app communication depends on individual implementation; the system supports modern protocols like TLS. |
| Storage | Encrypted with obselete encryption | [8] | Based on its Android version, it likely uses legacy Full-Disk Encryption (FDE) rather than the more secure File-Based Encryption (FBE). |
| Category score | 3 | ||
| User Authentication | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Value | Proof(s) | Comment |
| Account management | Basic | [9] | Supports basic Google account login and device screen lock management; lacks enterprise-grade or advanced account features. |
| Authentication | Basic | [10] | Relies on basic knowledge factors (PIN/Password/Pattern); lacks more secure mechanisms like multi-factor authentication (MFA). |
| Brute-force protection | Basic | [11] | Includes fundamental protections like time delays after failed attempts, but likely lacks adaptive or risk-based authentication features. |
| Event logging | Partial logging | [12] | The system has basic logging capabilities, but detailed security event logs are not accessible to average users. |
| Passwords | Default/Common/Easy to guess | [13] | No evidence of forced password change or complexity rules upon setup; many users likely use simple passwords. |
| Category score | 3 | ||
| Grade | F |
|---|
